You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Light pollution and its impact on human health and wildlife

Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) is exponentially increasing and several studies highlight detrimental effects on both humans and wildlife, including their reproductive and metabolic systems, cancer risk, and mental health. This Collection aims to explore the effects and underlying mechanisms in humans and other organisms.

Peer Review reports

Main text

For millions of years, light cycles have been constant – daily, lunar and yearly light cycles. These have regulated the activities of organisms, from the timing of reproduction to daily activities such as when to search for food and when to rest. The invention of artificial light, and its increased use, has changed that. Artificial light is now lighting up the night, both indoors and outdoors. This is eroding natural light cycles and threatening the natural rhythms in both humans and other organisms [1]. During the last century, the use of artificial light at night (ALAN) has increased exponentially, and the use is expected to further increase in parallel with global human population growth. The invention of light-emitting diodes, LEDs, has further exacerbated the problem. These are inexpensive to use, and their light intensities are often higher, with a spectrum closer to natural light, compared to traditional lamps, such as incandescent indoor light bulbs and high pressure sodium street lights [1, 2].

Because of artificial light, it is now possible for humans to work around the clock. However, several epidemiological studies, initially conducted on night-shift workers, indicated adverse effects in humans, especially a higher ratio of cancer cases [3]. In particular, high levels of ALAN has been associated with increased risk of breast cancer and possibly prostate cancer, but positive association was reported also for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and colorectal, pancreatic and thyroid cancer [3,4,5]. Apart from night-shift work, ALAN has been associated with increased risk of sleep disturbances, diabetes, obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors [6, 7]. More recent findings also suggested detrimental effects on mental health, including depression, mood disorders and cognitive impairment [8,9,10].

Artificial light influences not only humans but also wildlife, impacting both species exposed to direct light (e.g., birds in cities and mammals near highways), and wildlife far from light sources. This occurs through skyglow, where light radiating upwards from light sources (e.g., urban areas), is diverted back to Earth through scattering, illuminating areas far from the original light source [11]. A growing number of studies show that direct and indirect light affects the physiology, behavior and life history of animals, with consequences for their development, survival and reproductive success. For instance, insects are attracted to nocturnal lights, which also attracts their predators, especially bats [12]. Unnatural presence of light can affect migrating fish like salmons and eels that may take more time and energy with negative impact on the reproductive success [13]. Glow-worm females have difficulties attracting males, decreasing their reproductive success [14, 15]. Changes in behavior, survival and reproductive success can, in turn, influence the abundance and distribution of species and, hence, biodiversity, species interactions, and ultimately the functioning of the ecosystem, such as nutrient cycling, pollination and seed dispersal. Such changes can also negatively affect human society, considering that we rely on these ecosystem services (e.g., pollination and primary production) for our wellbeing and quality of life.

The effects of light pollution on living organisms can be multifaceted. On the one hand, light pollution can disrupt the reception of information such as daily light cycles, the environment or individual traits. For instance, the visibility of the glow-worm's glow can be diminished and reduce mating success. On the other hand, light pollution can change the use of light as a resource, such as in photosynthesis or daily activity patterns [16]. In particular, the disruption of the circadian cycle can influence an organism’s physiology, especially through changes in melatonin levels and the endocrine system. Many hormones, pheromones and metabolites are under circadian control and their disruption can have both short term and longer-term effects on health and the wellbeing of organisms.

An increasingly important topic in our human-disturbed world, is how to mitigate the negative effects of artificial light on life forms. Light is needed for many human activities and for increasing safety, but its intensity and spread are over-dimensioned. By limiting the use of artificial light to essential purposes, times and places (e.g., through the use of timers and shades) and by adjusting the light’s spectrum and intensity, negative effects can be significantly reduced. More research is now needed on the effectiveness of these measures and on the developments and technology needed to achieve these goals.

The aim of this Collection is to explore and explain the different ways in which ALAN can influence both humans and other organisms, and to discuss the effects the light can have on the natural world, as well as the possibility of mitigating negative effects. With this, we hope to inspire further research into this important topic, to ensure a wise use of artificial light in the future, which would safeguard a healthy and well-functioning world also for coming generations.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ALAN:

Artificial light at night

References

  1. Gaston KJ, de Miguel AS. Environmental impacts of artificial light at night. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2022;47:373–98. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1146/annurev-environ-112420-014438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanchez de Miguel A, Bennie J, Rosenfeld E, Dzurjak S, Gaston KJ. Environmental risks from artificial nighttime lighting widespread and increasing across Europe. Sci Adv. 2022;8(37):eabl6891. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1126/sciadv.abl6891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Night Shift Work. 2020. Vol. 124. https://www.iarc.who.int/news-events/iarc-monographs-volume-124-night-shift-work/.

  4. Urbano T, Vinceti M, Wise LA, Filippini T. Light at night and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Int J Health Geogr. 2021;20(1):44. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12942-021-00297-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palomar-Cros A, Deprato A, Papantoniou K, Straif K, Lacy P, Maidstone R, Adan A, Haldar P, Moitra S, Navarro JF, Durrington H, Moitra S, Kogevinas M, Harding BN. Indoor and outdoor artificial light-at-night (ALAN) and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of multiple cancer sites and with a critical appraisal of exposure assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2024;955:177059. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozejko M, Tarski I, Malodobra-Mazur M. Outdoor artificial light at night and human health: a review of epidemiological studies. Environ Res. 2023;218:115049. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.envres.2022.115049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu YX, Zhang JH, Ding WQ. Association of light at night with cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2024;342:123130. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tancredi S, Urbano T, Vinceti M, Filippini T. Artificial light at night and risk of mental disorders: a systematic review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;833:155185. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen M, Zhao Y, Lu Q, Ye Z, Bai A, Xie Z, Zhang D, Jiang Y. Artificial light at night and risk of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Prev Med. 2024;29:73. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1265/ehpm.24-00257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Filippini T, Costanzini S, Chiari A, Urbano T, Despini F, Tondelli M, Bedin R, Zamboni G, Teggi S, Vinceti M. Light at night exposure and risk of dementia conversion from mild cognitive impairment in a Northern Italy population. Int J Health Geogr. 2024;23(1):25. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12942-024-00384-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SXT, Amir Z, Moore JH, Gaynor KM, Luskin MS. Effects of human disturbances on wildlife behaviour and consequences for predator-prey overlap in Southeast Asia. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):1521. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41467-024-45905-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li H, Allen P, Boris S, Lagrama S, Lyons J, Mills C, Moussi P, Nichols C, Tacosik C, Tsaousis M, Livingston Wilson N, Grider JF, Parker KA, Kalcounis-Rueppell MC. Artificial light at night (ALAN) pollution alters bat lunar chronobiology: insights from broad-scale long-term acoustic monitoring. Ecol Process. 2024;13(1):13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13717-024-00491-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pérez Vega C, Jechow A, Campbell JA, Zielinska-Dabkowska KM, Hölker F. Light pollution from illuminated bridges as a potential barrier for migrating fish–Linking measurements with a proposal for a conceptual model. Basic Appl Ecol. 2024;74:1–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.baae.2023.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elgert C, Hopkins J, Kaitala A, Candolin U. Reproduction under light pollution: maladaptive response to spatial variation in artificial light in a glow-worm. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1931;2020(287):20200806. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rspb.2020.0806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moubarak EM, David Fernandes AS, Stewart AJA, Niven JE. Artificial light impairs local attraction to females in male glow-worms. J Exp Biol. 2023;226(11):jeb245760. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1242/jeb.245760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bará S, Falchi F. Artificial light at night: a global disruptor of the night-time environment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1892;2023(378):20220352. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rstb.2022.0352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

TF was supported by grants “PRIN 2022” (no. 2022MHMRPR) and “PRIN 2022 PNRR” (no. P20229KSXB) from the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) funded by European Union – Next Generation EU, and by grant “UNIMORE FAR 2023” from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

UC and TF contributed to the conception and drafting of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ulrika Candolin or Tommaso Filippini.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Ulrika Candolin and Tommaso Filippini are Guest Editors of the collection Light pollution and its impact on human health and wildlife.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Candolin, U., Filippini, T. Light pollution and its impact on human health and wildlife. BMC Environ Sci 2, 1 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s44329-025-00017-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s44329-025-00017-7